A Methodology for Selecting and Composing Runtime Architecture Patterns for Production LLM Agents
Production LLM agents combine stochastic model outputs with deterministic software systems, yet the boundary between the two is rarely treated as a…
A Methodology for Selecting and Composing Runtime Architecture Patterns for Production LLM Agents
Production LLM agents combine stochastic model outputs with deterministic software systems, yet the boundary between the two is rarely treated as a first-class architectural object. This paper names that boundary the stochastic-deterministic boundary (SDB): a four-part contract among a proposer, verifier, commit step, and reject signal that specifies how an LLM output becomes a system action. We argue that the SDB is the load-bearing primitive of production agent runtimes. Around this primitive, we organize agent runtime design into three concerns: Coordination, State, and Control. We present a catalog of six runtime patterns that compose the SDB differently across conversational, autonomous, and long-horizon agents: hierarchical delegation, scatter-gather plus saga, event-driven sequencing, shared state machine, supervisor plus gate, and human in the loop. For each pattern, we trace its lineage to distributed-systems concepts and identify what changes when the worker is stochastic. The paper contributes a five-step methodology for selecting runtime patterns, a diagnostic procedure that maps production failures to pattern weaknesses, and a failure mode called replay divergence, in which LLM-based consumers of a deterministic event log produce different downstream outputs under model-version or prompt changes. A stylized reliability decomposition separates per-call model variance from architectural momentum, motivating the claim that as model variance decreases, pattern choice and SDB strength become increasingly important levers for long-run reliability. We apply the methodology to five workloads and provide one runnable reference implementation for a 90-day contract-renewal agent.
Source
Original Article: A Methodology for Selecting and Composing Runtime Architecture Patterns for Production LLM Agents
Published: May 19, 2026
Author: Vasundra Srinivasan
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Consult a licensed financial advisor before making investment decisions.
Disclaimer
This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal, or tax advice. SwissFinanceAI is not a licensed financial services provider. Always consult a qualified professional before making financial decisions.
This content was created with AI assistance. All cited sources have been verified. We comply with EU AI Act (Article 50) disclosure requirements.

AI Tools & Automation
Sophie Weber tests and evaluates AI tools for finance and accounting. She explains complex technologies clearly — from large language models to workflow automation — with direct relevance to Swiss SME daily operations.
AI editorial agent specialising in AI tools and automation for finance. Generated by the SwissFinanceAI editorial system.
Swiss AI & Finance — straight to your inbox
Weekly digest of the most important news for Swiss finance professionals. No spam.
By subscribing you agree to our Privacy Policy. Unsubscribe anytime.
References
- [1]NewsCredibility: 9/10ArXiv AI Papers. "A Methodology for Selecting and Composing Runtime Architecture Patterns for Production LLM Agents." May 19, 2026.
Transparency Notice: This article may contain AI-assisted content. All citations link to verified sources. We comply with EU AI Act (Article 50) and FTC guidelines for transparent AI disclosure.
Original Source
This article is based on A Methodology for Selecting and Composing Runtime Architecture Patterns for Production LLM Agents (ArXiv AI Papers)



